Film Review Bad Boys II Essay Example

Film Review Bad Boys II Essay Detective Mike Lowrey (Will Smith) and Detective Marcus Burnette (Martin Lawrence) team up again since 1995 for the sequel bad boys II. Both Detectives are partners in the TNT (Tactical Narcotics Team). They are assigned to a job where a Spaniard, Johnny Tapia (Jordi Molla) is smuggling drugs and a Russian (Peter Stormare) controls the distribution and owns almost every nightclub in town. Together they run the largest ecstasy import business in Miami. Burnettes sister, Syd (Gabrielle Union). is assigned to the same case as Lowrey and her brother. The police are having trouble finding evidence to convict Tapia resulting in Syd having to go undercover for five months, almost killing herself in a car chase, while Smith proves that he can drive and shoot at the same time and Lawrence checks to see how effective it is to shoot inside the vehicle rather than out. The climax of the movie is reached when there is a major shoot out in Cuba. Compared to the first Bad Boys movie this is a major disappointment to viewers who have waited 8 years for the sequel. Like all of Bays movies nothing is done in moderation, theres at least a million bullets fired in one scene alone! The motorway car chase is almost a replica of Matrix Reloaded and Terminator 3. Throw in some KKKs and dead bodies all over the motorway you have the total gross-out factor known to man. The movie is quite unpredictable but the anticipation Is lost because the plot has too many twists. We will write a custom essay sample on Film Review Bad Boys II specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Film Review Bad Boys II specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Film Review Bad Boys II specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Smith gives a good performance and Lawrence isnt too bad, he gives a hilarious performance when he swallows a couple of Ecstasy pills. Molla and Stormare do a great job, the power hungry roles fit them like a glove. I think we will continue to see them acting in similar roles. The movies too long and too crude and probably not suitable for the certificate rating of 15. However the amount of comedy and action substitutes for this. I think that Columbia Pictures have only just made this is a successful movie. Dont hold your breath for another sequel. Reviewed by Shasta Nisar Commentary The document is a film review. We know this as the information such as details about characters and directors names are included in the first few lines. This factual data at the start of the document, gives the reader an indication that it is a film review. The personal views given also suggest this, for example, this is a major disappointment. Using personal comments means that a tone is created, as the author is sharing their views with the reader. Therefore a bond is formed as the author tries to persuade and inform the reader. Reviews are also read by people who have seen the film and want a professional view. The personal comments of the write may be shared by the reader or they may differ from those of the reader, either way the reader is engaged in the review. The text is aimed at people over 15, as this is what the certificate viewing is. It is also aimed at people who like comedy and action movies and would like to find out details about the movie before they watch, buy or rent it. The language suits the document as it is colloquial- major, and contains the views of the writer- Smith gives a good performance. On the surface the text is about the film Bad Boys II. However there are deeper meaning and attitudes. The authors opinion is expressed openly in this review for example- I think that Columbia Pictures have only just made this a successful movie. This may not be an opinion which is shared by other critics but the general tone set throughout the review is that the movie was not as good as the first one. This is done by using language such as too long and too crude. This coheres with a comment earlier in the review- nothing is done in moderation. The format of the review starts with general information about the movie such as the amount of time it runs for. The first paragraph is about the characters and who they are played by. The roles that are played by these actors are also included. The second paragraph contains the main parts of the plot. In this paragraph a informal tone is set by using the characters surname- Smith and Lawrence. It is also shot by selecting parts of the plot out which suggest the roles that each detective plays, for example- Smith proves that he can drive and shoot at the same time and Lawrence checks to see how effective it is to shoot inside the vehicle. This shows knowledge of the movie which is entertaining for the reader to read and not that factual or relevant to the reader. The third paragraph is the writers views and knowledge of the director Bay. The writer uses hyperbole- theres at least a million bullets fired in one scene alone! This exaggeration emphasises that there is a lot of shooting in that scene but also in other scenes too. The reader knows that this is an overstatement because of the use of the exclamation mark and also the quantity a million, one scene lasts approximately fifteen minutes, it is very difficult to fire, or create the illusion of, one million bullets. There is also comparison between a scene in Bad Boys II and similar scenes in other major films that had been released in 2003. This shows that the writer has knowledge on the industry and makes a good persuasion tool to influences the reader to agree with the writer. The last paragraph is the authors views on the actors performances. The writer uses a simile- fit them like a glove, this shows that the roles/characters suited the actors and were played extremely well and were very convincing. The purpose of a review is to inform the reader of a product and to express your own opinions. Ina review the writer must be careful not to give too much information about the plot away. I think that this review achieved its purpose and that the plot was not revealed as the write mentions that there are twists in the plot but does not expose them, this creates anticipation within the reader of what is to come, this is a mild encouragement for the reader to watch the movie and find out. The views express may deter potential viewers so the writer must be careful not to give very strong opinions as people may get offended.

Biography of Malcolm Gladwell, Writer

Biography of Malcolm Gladwell, Writer English-born Canadian journalist, author, and speaker Malcolm Timothy  Gladwell is known for his articles and books that identify, approach and explain the unexpected implications of social science research. In addition to his writing work, he is the podcast host of  Revisionist History. Early Life Malcolm Gladwell was born on September 3, 1963, in  Fareham,  Hampshire, England  to a father who was a mathematics professor, Graham Gladwell, and his mother Joyce Gladwell, a Jamaican psychotherapist. Gladwell grew up in Elmira, Ontario, Canada. He studied at the University of Toronto and received his bachelors degree in History in 1984 before moving to the U.S. to become a journalist. He initially covered business and science at the Washington Post where he worked for nine years. He began freelancing at The New Yorker before being offered a position as a staff writer there in 1996.   Malcolm Gladwell’s Literary Work In 2000, Malcolm Gladwell took a phrase that had up until that point been most frequently associated with epidemiology and single-handedly realigned it in all of our minds as a social phenomenon. The phrase was tipping point, and Gladwells breakthrough pop-sociology book of the same name was about why and how some ideas spread like social epidemics. became a social epidemic itself and continues to be a bestseller. Gladwell followed with Blink (2005), another book in which he examined a social phenomenon by dissecting numerous examples to arrive at his conclusions. Like The Tipping Point, Blink claimed a  basis in research, but it was still written in a breezy and accessible voice that give Gladwells writing popular appeal. Blink is about the notion of rapid cognition - snap judgments and how and why people make them. The idea for the book came to Gladwell after he noticed that he was experiencing social repercussions as a result of growing out his afro (prior to that point, he had kept his hair close-cropped). Both The Tipping Point and Blink were phenomenal bestsellers and his third book, Outliers (2008), took the same bestselling track. In Outliers, Gladwell once again synthesizes the experiences of numerous individuals in order to move beyond those experiences to arrive at a social phenomenon that others hadnt noticed, or at least hadnt popularized in the way that Gladwell has proved adept at doing. In compelling narrative form, Outliers examines the role that environment and cultural background play in the unfolding of great success stories. Gladwells fourth book,  What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures (2009) gathers Gladwells favorite articles from  The New Yorker  from his time as a staff writer with the publication. The stories play with the common theme of perception as Gladwell tries to show the reader the world through the eyes of others - even if the point of view happens to be that of a dog. His most recent publication,  David and Goliath (2013), was inspired in part by an article that Gladwell penned for  The New Yorker  in 2009 called How David Beats Goliath. This fifth book from Gladwell focuses on the contrast of advantage and probability of success amongst the underdogs from varying situations, the most well-known story concerning the biblical David and Goliath. Although the book didnt receive intense critical acclaim, it was a bestseller and hit No. 4 on  The New York Times  hardcover non-fiction chart, and No. 5 on USA Todays best-selling books.

Karl Marx about alienation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Karl Marx about alienation - Essay Example Karl Marx about alienation Alienation of labor occurs only in a capitalist society, where capitalist modes of production exist. Marx identifies four different types of alienation. They are a) the alienation of the laborer from the product, b) the alienation of the laborer from the labor process, c) the alienation of the laborer from his fellow human beings and d) alienation of human beings from human nature. In the capitalist mode of production, the ownership of the product produced by the labor-power of the laborers is not with them; rather, it is controlled by the capitalists. Before the upcoming of capitalism, labor was solely part of the laborer and was dependent on him. In such a situation, the laborer had full control over the production and use of anything he produced. In the new system, labor acquired the status of an object of external existence and thus it becomes autonomous. This autonomy gained by the product controls the worker and his labor. This is a form of alienation where the life given to the product by the laborer alienates its creator .As a result; the laborer becomes a commodity like any other product available in the market. The labor-process refers to the process of production. In the time prior to capitalism, the laborers had full control over the conditions in which he works. These conditions include how the work is organized, when to work, how the work affects the physical and psychological states of the laborer and so on. In the capitalist system, the worker lost control over these conditions.